OECD Transfer Pricing Update: What UAE Businesses Need to Know

OECD Transfer Pricing Update What UAE Businesses Need to Know

What UAE Businesses Need to Know About Transfer Pricing Documentation and Management Fees

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has released a public consultation document proposing revisions to Chapter VII of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines relating to intra-group services. The consultation seeks to modernise existing guidance and provide greater clarity on how multinational groups should assess, document, and price intra-group services.


While the consultation is not yet final guidance, it offers an important indication of the direction global transfer pricing enforcement is moving toward. For multinational groups operating in the UAE, particularly those using regional headquarters, shared service centres, management support arrangements, and cross-border service charges, the proposed revisions could have significant implications.


The key message is clear: transfer pricing compliance is increasingly focused on demonstrating real commercial value and operational substance rather than relying solely on invoices, contracts, and benchmarking studies.

Why This Matters for UAE Businesses

The UAE has rapidly emerged as a regional headquarters hub for multinational enterprises, family groups, investment holding structures, and expanding regional businesses.

 

Many UAE-based groups operate using:

 

      • Regional headquarters structures
      • Shared service centres
      • Centralised finance functions
      • Group treasury operations
      • Management support arrangements
      • IT and technology support centres
      • Human resources and payroll functions
      • Procurement and supply chain management teams

 

These structures often involve charging management fees or service fees between related entities across multiple jurisdictions.

 

Historically, many transfer pricing reviews focused heavily on:

 

      • Intercompany agreements
      • Transfer pricing benchmarking studies
      • Cost allocation methodologies
      • Management fee invoices

 

The OECD consultation suggests that future transfer pricing examinations may place significantly greater emphasis on proving that services were actually performed and that recipients received a genuine commercial benefit.

The Growing Importance of the Benefit Test

One of the central themes of the consultation is the continued emphasis on the “benefit test.”

 

According to the draft guidance, an intra-group service exists only when an activity performed by one group member provides another group member with economic or commercial value that enhances or maintains its business position.

 

The consultation reinforces that tax authorities will increasingly ask:

 

      • What service was provided?
      • Who performed the service?
      • Who received the benefit?
      • Why was the service needed?
      • How did the service improve business operations?
      • Would an independent company have been willing to pay for the same service?

 

These questions move the discussion beyond documentation and into operational reality.

Invoice Alone Is No Longer Enough

A particularly important point emerging from the consultation is that the existence of a service agreement or invoice does not automatically prove that a service has been rendered.

 

The draft explicitly states that:

 

      • A service fee description alone is insufficient evidence.
      • An intercompany contract alone is insufficient evidence.
      • Payment alone does not establish the existence of a service transaction.

 

This represents a significant practical challenge for multinational groups.

 

For example, if a UAE regional headquarters charges management fees to subsidiaries across the Middle East, the group may now need stronger evidence demonstrating:

 

      • Meetings held
      • Strategic decisions made
      • Reports delivered
      • Technical support provided
      • Training conducted
      • Business improvements achieved

 

Simply issuing a year-end management fee invoice may not be enough.

Operational Substance Becomes Critical

The consultation reflects a broader international trend toward examining operational substance.

 

Tax authorities increasingly expect businesses to demonstrate:

Who Performed the Work

Evidence may include:

      • Employee records
      • Job descriptions
      • Timesheets
      • Internal communications
      • Project documentation

What Activities Were Performed

Examples include:

      • Strategic planning
      • Financial management
      • Procurement support
      • Treasury services
      • Human resources support
      • Technology implementation
      • Compliance advisory services

How the Recipient Benefited

Businesses should be prepared to explain:

      • Cost savings achieved
      • Revenue improvements
      • Operational efficiencies
      • Risk reductions
      • Compliance improvements

 

The stronger the evidence linking activities to commercial benefit, the more defensible the service charge becomes.

UAE Regional Headquarters Structures Under the Spotlight

The UAE has become a preferred location for regional headquarters serving the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia.

 

Common regional headquarters activities include:

 

      • Executive management
      • Strategic planning
      • Treasury operations
      • Legal support
      • Tax management
      • Procurement coordination
      • Shared technology services

 

The OECD consultation indicates that these arrangements will likely receive increased scrutiny.

 

Regional headquarters should ensure that:

 

      • Functions performed are clearly documented
      • Responsibilities are properly defined
      • Employees possess relevant expertise
      • Service recipients can demonstrate benefits received

 

This is especially important where significant management fees are charged across multiple jurisdictions.

Shared Service Centres Need Stronger Documentation

Many UAE groups operate centralised shared service models.

 

Common shared services include:

 

 

The consultation recognises the importance of shared services but places greater emphasis on demonstrating actual service delivery and benefit received.

 

Businesses should review whether existing documentation adequately supports:

 

      • Nature of services provided
      • Service recipients
      • Allocation methodologies
      • Expected benefits
      • Actual outcomes

Focus on Shareholder Activities

Another important aspect of the consultation is the distinction between chargeable services and shareholder activities.

 

The OECD continues to maintain that certain activities performed solely because of ownership interests should not be charged to subsidiaries.

 

Examples may include:

 

      • Shareholder meetings
      • Parent company reporting obligations
      • Investor relations activities
      • Parent-level governance requirements

 

Groups should carefully evaluate whether costs currently included within management fees may be considered shareholder activities.

Documentation Expectations Are Rising

Transfer pricing documentation has traditionally focused on:


      • Functional analysis
      • Benchmarking studies
      • Local files
      • Master files


The consultation suggests that future documentation may need to include more operational evidence supporting the actual provision of services.


Examples may include:


      • Project reports
      • Meeting minutes
      • Training materials
      • Email communications
      • Service delivery records
      • Performance metrics
      • Internal presentations
      • Resource allocation evidence


The ability to demonstrate what was actually delivered may become just as important as proving that the pricing is arm’s length.

Implications for UAE Corporate Tax Compliance

The UAE Corporate Tax regime requires transactions between related parties to comply with the arm’s length principle.


Although the OECD consultation is not UAE law, OECD principles continue to influence transfer pricing frameworks globally.


As UAE transfer pricing compliance continues to mature, businesses should expect increasing focus on:


      • Substance over form
      • Commercial rationale
      • Functional evidence
      • Demonstrable benefits
      • Robust documentation


Companies relying heavily on management fees and service charges should proactively review existing arrangements before tax authorities begin asking more detailed questions.

Practical Steps UAE Businesses Should Take Now

Businesses should consider the following actions:

Review Existing Intercompany Service Arrangements

Identify:

      • Management fees
      • Shared service charges
      • Cost allocations
      • Regional headquarters charges

Strengthen Evidence of Service Delivery

Maintain:

      • Meeting records
      • Deliverables
      • Advisory reports
      • Training logs
      • Communication records

Validate Commercial Benefits

Document:

      • Efficiency improvements
      • Cost savings
      • Revenue enhancements
      • Risk mitigation outcomes

Review Shareholder Activity Risk

Assess whether any costs currently charged to subsidiaries should remain at the shareholder level.

Update Transfer Pricing Documentation

Ensure documentation reflects operational reality rather than relying solely on contractual arrangements.

Looking Ahead

The OECD consultation on intra-group services represents an important evolution in transfer pricing practice.

 

The direction of travel is clear: tax authorities increasingly expect businesses to demonstrate substance, commercial value, and genuine operational benefit behind intercompany service charges.

 

For UAE groups operating regional headquarters, shared service centres, or management fee arrangements, this development serves as an early warning to review existing structures and strengthen supporting evidence.

 

The strongest transfer pricing position in the future will not simply be supported by invoices, agreements, and benchmarking studies. It will be supported by clear evidence that services were actually performed, commercial value was delivered, and independent parties would have been willing to pay for those services under comparable circumstances.

 

Businesses that begin preparing now will be better positioned to manage future transfer pricing scrutiny and maintain confidence in their cross-border service arrangements.

 

Share this post on

Related Articles